Tag Archive | Nancy Pelosi

Merchants Of Despair

Afterburner with Bill Whittle

A Happy House Forclosure

Stop starring at my gavel!

It’s not the same as losing all that you have but it is SO good enough for now!

This Video Scares Me!

And I’m not even a Democrat¬† ūüė¶

Money well spent.

Pelosi, Shovel Ready!

Madam Speaker, You Are Becoming Obvious Now!         

Pelosi tries to waddle out of the septic muck she got herself into with the water boarding controversy.          

“Yes I¬†am saying the CIA was misleading the Congress, and at the same time the (Bush) administration was misleading the Congress on weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, to which I¬†said that this intelligence doesn’t support the imminent threat,” Pelosi said at her weekly news conference.

“Every step of the way the administration was misleading the Congress and that is the issue and that’s why we need a truth commission,”¬†she said.

You gotta love a Liberal that keeps on ‘giving’.¬† ¬†I can’t help but wonder if she hears herself when she speaks?¬† ¬†And¬†talk about body language! If only interrogating a terrorist was as easy as a press op. with Nancy Bot ox Pelosi!
Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to Ma.gnoliaAdd to TechnoratiAdd to FurlAdd to Newsvine                                                                                                                                                                                                            © 2009

Drop and roll Pelosi, Drop and roll!!

pelosiCan anyone believe them anymore!

The lies just keep on coming. Nancy Pelosi spent some time Thursday trying to deflect the GOP charge that she knew about the waterboarding for some time, at least since ’02!

Pelosi says she was briefed by Bush administration officials on the legal justification for using waterboarding ‚ÄĒ but that they never followed through on promises to inform her when they actually began using “enhanced” interrogation techniques

“In that or any other briefing‚Ķwe were not, and I repeat, were not told that waterboarding or any of these other enhanced interrogation techniques were used. What they did tell us is that they had some legislative counsel … opinions that they could be used,” she told reporters.¬†¬†¬†

Pelosi says members who receive classified intelligence briefings are powerless to act on them ‚ÄĒ or even discuss them with staff — due to confidentiality requirements.

As a consequence, some members simply skip classified briefings to avoid being “hamstrung” by requirements they keep silent on the topics discussed.

This is ridiculous to think….Unless I am to believe that Pelosi, the highest ranking Dem. on the Intelligence Committee was not paying attention to what was being discussed in those meetings.¬† No if this was the case the left would have been Screaming for heads on a pike, but remember we were under attack at the¬†time right!¬† Oh but that was just a couple of misguided individuals who came to the United States via the northern boarder ( According to Napolitano in another rewrite of history ), and decided to commit ” man made acts of violence” or what we would normally call “Terrorism”!!¬†¬†¬†¬†¬† But the politician can’t help but try to float on a frisbee in a ocean of political bullshit, trying to negotiate what ever direction the wave goes.

Here is what happend in ’02

From a Washington¬†Post¬†story released in ’07

In September 2002, four members of Congress met in secret for a first look at a unique CIA program designed to wring vital information from reticent terrorism suspects in U.S. custody. For more than an hour, the bipartisan group, which included current House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), was given a virtual tour of the CIA’s overseas detention sites and the harsh techniques interrogators had devised to try to make their prisoners talk.

Among the techniques described, said two officials present, was waterboarding, a practice that years later would be condemned as torture by Democrats and some Republicans on Capitol Hill. But on that day, no objections were raised. Instead, at least two lawmakers in the room asked the CIA to push harder, two U.S. officials said.

UPDATE: A Pelosi spokesman passes along her response to the article when it first appeared, claiming that Pelosi’s successor on the intel committee¬† — Yep, Jane Harman — lodged a protest with the CIA when she learned waterboarding was in use.

“On one occasion, in the fall of 2002, I was briefed on interrogation techniques the Administration was considering using in the future. The Administration advised that legal counsel for the both the CIA and the Department of Justice had concluded that the techniques were legal.

I had no further briefings on the techniques. Several months later, my successor as Ranking Member of the House Intelligence Committee, Jane Harman, was briefed more extensively and advised the techniques had in fact been employed. It was my understanding at that time that Congresswoman Harman filed a letter in early 2003 to the CIA to protest the use of such techniques, a protest with which I concurred.”

Lower down in the article, the authors and their sources acknowledge Pelosi & Co. were severely constrained in what they could do with the information ‚ÄĒ and had no way of knowing how the techniques would ultimately used or abused in a pre-Abu Gharaib era.

Congressional officials say the groups’ ability to challenge the practices was hampered by strict rules of secrecy that prohibited them from being able to take notes or consult legal experts or members of their own staffs. And while various officials have described the briefings as detailed and graphic, it is unclear precisely what members were told about waterboarding and how it is conducted. Several officials familiar with the briefings also recalled that the meetings were marked by an atmosphere of deep concern about the possibility of an imminent terrorist attack.

“In fairness, the environment was different then because we were closer to Sept. 11 and people were still in a panic,” said one U.S. official present during the early briefings. “But there was no objecting, no hand-wringing. The attitude was, ‘We don’t care what you do to those guys as long as you get the information you need to protect the American people.'”

Madame Speaker if you will please tell the truth!¬† I would have more respect for you if you simply told the American people “we did what we had to do to keep the American people safe”. Tell us you were doing your job and not change what was right at the time to meet your political¬†needs now.¬†¬† But that falls under the Morals category and well lets face it you have none.

LIAR LIAR do you smell that Nancy! PANTS ON FIRE!    Drop and roll Nancy!!

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to Ma.gnoliaAdd to TechnoratiAdd to FurlAdd to Newsvine

%d bloggers like this: