Hold on we have heard this before.
From Associated Press;
ISLAMABAD — Pakistan’s president said Monday his intelligence agencies believe Usama bin Laden may be dead, but he added there is no proof. Other Pakistani officials and a U.S. counterterrorism official said they thought the Al Qaeda chief is alive.
How will we really know if this is true, one would ask?
Just wait a day or two and binnie will be on tape accounting his roll in the Bio attack! ( At least that’s what the conspiracy theorist would have you believe).
Obama is not ready yet!
By the White House’s own count, Obama is outpacing his three predecessors at getting top-level appointees confirmed. But the numbers still are paltry, given all the vacancies to be filled. As of March 31, by an internal White House tally, Obama had 38 top-level officials confirmed, compared with 27 for George W. Bush, 37 for Clinton, and 27 for George H.W. Bush. CBS News.
I bet that Obama is not quite as happy as the press considering our current Headline. We all remember White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel on The Wall Street Journal ” Never let a serious crisis go to waste. What I mean by that is it’s an opportunity to do things you couldn’t do before.” At the time he said this our economy was showing rapid disintegration, but Obama had already appointed Master thief Timmy tax cheat Geithner to Scroll Saw a new Socialist Financial Institution puzzle. Excellent timing for that, this however is a little different.
All told, Obama has about 500 appointments to make that are subject to Senate confirmation, and about 3,000 positions to fill overall!!
With the outbreak of this Swine Flu, Obama surly must be upset that he don’t have the Heath and Human Service seat filled, The Golf outing on Sunday shows that. How or who will take advantage of this crisis?
Can anyone believe them anymore!
The lies just keep on coming. Nancy Pelosi spent some time Thursday trying to deflect the GOP charge that she knew about the waterboarding for some time, at least since ’02!
Pelosi says she was briefed by Bush administration officials on the legal justification for using waterboarding — but that they never followed through on promises to inform her when they actually began using “enhanced” interrogation techniques
“In that or any other briefing…we were not, and I repeat, were not told that waterboarding or any of these other enhanced interrogation techniques were used. What they did tell us is that they had some legislative counsel … opinions that they could be used,” she told reporters.
Pelosi says members who receive classified intelligence briefings are powerless to act on them — or even discuss them with staff — due to confidentiality requirements.
As a consequence, some members simply skip classified briefings to avoid being “hamstrung” by requirements they keep silent on the topics discussed.
This is ridiculous to think….Unless I am to believe that Pelosi, the highest ranking Dem. on the Intelligence Committee was not paying attention to what was being discussed in those meetings. No if this was the case the left would have been Screaming for heads on a pike, but remember we were under attack at the time right! Oh but that was just a couple of misguided individuals who came to the United States via the northern boarder ( According to Napolitano in another rewrite of history ), and decided to commit ” man made acts of violence” or what we would normally call “Terrorism”!! But the politician can’t help but try to float on a frisbee in a ocean of political bullshit, trying to negotiate what ever direction the wave goes.
Here is what happend in ’02
From a Washington Post story released in ’07
In September 2002, four members of Congress met in secret for a first look at a unique CIA program designed to wring vital information from reticent terrorism suspects in U.S. custody. For more than an hour, the bipartisan group, which included current House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), was given a virtual tour of the CIA’s overseas detention sites and the harsh techniques interrogators had devised to try to make their prisoners talk.
Among the techniques described, said two officials present, was waterboarding, a practice that years later would be condemned as torture by Democrats and some Republicans on Capitol Hill. But on that day, no objections were raised. Instead, at least two lawmakers in the room asked the CIA to push harder, two U.S. officials said.
UPDATE: A Pelosi spokesman passes along her response to the article when it first appeared, claiming that Pelosi’s successor on the intel committee — Yep, Jane Harman — lodged a protest with the CIA when she learned waterboarding was in use.
“On one occasion, in the fall of 2002, I was briefed on interrogation techniques the Administration was considering using in the future. The Administration advised that legal counsel for the both the CIA and the Department of Justice had concluded that the techniques were legal.
I had no further briefings on the techniques. Several months later, my successor as Ranking Member of the House Intelligence Committee, Jane Harman, was briefed more extensively and advised the techniques had in fact been employed. It was my understanding at that time that Congresswoman Harman filed a letter in early 2003 to the CIA to protest the use of such techniques, a protest with which I concurred.”
Lower down in the article, the authors and their sources acknowledge Pelosi & Co. were severely constrained in what they could do with the information — and had no way of knowing how the techniques would ultimately used or abused in a pre-Abu Gharaib era.
Congressional officials say the groups’ ability to challenge the practices was hampered by strict rules of secrecy that prohibited them from being able to take notes or consult legal experts or members of their own staffs. And while various officials have described the briefings as detailed and graphic, it is unclear precisely what members were told about waterboarding and how it is conducted. Several officials familiar with the briefings also recalled that the meetings were marked by an atmosphere of deep concern about the possibility of an imminent terrorist attack.
“In fairness, the environment was different then because we were closer to Sept. 11 and people were still in a panic,” said one U.S. official present during the early briefings. “But there was no objecting, no hand-wringing. The attitude was, ‘We don’t care what you do to those guys as long as you get the information you need to protect the American people.'”
Madame Speaker if you will please tell the truth! I would have more respect for you if you simply told the American people “we did what we had to do to keep the American people safe”. Tell us you were doing your job and not change what was right at the time to meet your political needs now. But that falls under the Morals category and well lets face it you have none.
LIAR LIAR do you smell that Nancy! PANTS ON FIRE! Drop and roll Nancy!!
By Maria Puente, USA TODAYAfter a week of unabashed hysteria about Scottish chanteuse Susan Boyle, it’s time to pause and ask: What’s that all about?
A psychological boost for a world battered by economic calamity? A spiritual moment for millions in search of transcendence? Maybe it’s about rooting for the underdog. Or maybe it’s just a new reminder of an old truism: You can’t judge a book by its cover.
“Susan Boyle is a Disney movie waiting to happen,” says church worker Janelle Gregory, 34, of Olathe, Kan.
Boyle, for those who have been unconscious lately, is the middle-aged woman with frizzy hair who has been all over TV and computer screens for days, singing a Broadway show tune while millions wept and shouted and applauded wildly.
Ten days ago, Boyle — 47, unglamorous, unfashionable, unknown — faced down a sneering British audience and panel of judges on Britain’s Got Talent, including the ever-sneery Simon Cowell. Then, in an instant, she turned jeers to cheers with her rendition of one of the weepier numbers from Les Misérables. Almost as instantly, Boyle went viral: A clip on YouTube garnered millions of hits (almost 30 million so far, not counting millions more on thousands of other versions on YouTube).
What is the real story here? Maybe I got this wrong but is it because we have a women with a phenomenal voice that she worked hard to perfect, or is it that a voice like that came out of a women that doe’s not look like a drunk nightlife patron,cocaine snortin skank named Brittney?
Everywhere I go, everyone I talk to say the same thing “did you see her on youtube” ” did you catch that video of Susan Boyle”,did ya did ya did ya, hell even Niel Boortz was gleaning!
This Tier society we live in, Man, Women, Black,White, Rich, Poor, people looking down on others, looking sideways,looking behind you.
WE SHOULD ALL BE ASHAMED !!!!!